﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title>First Aid Theology</title>
	<updated>2012-05-27T23:02:12Z</updated>
	<id>http://firstaidtheology.net/atom.aspx</id>
	<link href="http://firstaidtheology.net/atom.aspx" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link href="http://firstaidtheology.net" rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<generator uri="http://app.onlinequickblog.com/" version="2.6.8">Quick Blogcast</generator>
	<entry>
		<title>The Conquest of Canaan</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://firstaidtheology.net/2007/11/21/the-conquest-of-canaan.aspx?ref=rss" />
		<id>tag:firstaidtheology.net,2011-01-08:9122ce11-74d4-440f-a67f-100d0a3e456f</id>
		<author>
			<name>Phil Hobbs</name>
		</author>
		<category term="Salvation" />
		<category term="Scripture" />
		<updated>2011-01-08T17:09:00Z</updated>
		<published>2011-01-08T17:09:00Z</published>
		<content type="html">&lt;p style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;&lt;font size="4"&gt;One of the frustrating things about Scripture is that it
isn't written to gratify our curiosity.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;p style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;&lt;font size="4"&gt;
There are many things passed over
in silence that we would very much like to hear about, and so many things that
seem different between the two Testaments. There is a deep unity in the 
character of God as revealed by the whole Bible, Old Testament and New 
Testament,which we can perhaps demonstrate best by looking at the hardest 
question of all: the morality of the conquest of Canaan. Here's what the
Scripture says:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/font&gt; &lt;p style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;&lt;font size="4"&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;
 Then the LORD said to Abram, ”Know ...&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/font&gt;</content>
		<summary>&lt;p style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;&lt;font size="4"&gt;One of the frustrating things about Scripture is that it
isn't written to gratify our curiosity.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;p style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;&lt;font size="4"&gt;
There are many things passed over
in silence that we would very much like to hear about, and so many things that
seem different between the two Testaments. There is a deep unity in the 
character of God as revealed by the whole Bible, Old Testament and New 
Testament,which we can perhaps demonstrate best by looking at the hardest 
question of all: the morality of the conquest of Canaan. Here's what the
Scripture says:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/font&gt; &lt;p style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;&lt;font size="4"&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;
 Then the LORD said to Abram, ”Know ...&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/font&gt;</summary>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Why Care About Doctrine?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://firstaidtheology.net/2008/01/11/why-care-about-doctrine.aspx?ref=rss" />
		<id>tag:firstaidtheology.net,2008-01-11:58ad7ad1-a0f2-4edc-b846-c0448af90aa2</id>
		<author>
			<name>Phil Hobbs</name>
		</author>
		<category term="Salvation" />
		<category term="Scripture" />
		<category term="Tradition" />
		<category term="Christian Teaching" />
		<updated>2008-01-11T16:58:00Z</updated>
		<published>2008-01-11T16:58:00Z</published>
		<content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;font face="Arial" size="4"&gt;
The West is going through a period of religious conflict.
Not the one you might be thinking of--this one has nothing to do
with Islam.  A thousand years ago, Franks and Saracens were fighting
over a smaller issue, namely whose book was really the
self-revelation of God.&lt;a href="#note1" name="ref1"&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;  Today's struggle is among people who identify
themselves as Christians.  They are fighting for the soul of the
Church and the existence of historic Christianity in the West.  In
the balance hangs the salvation of millions of God's people.  This
fight is about whether God has revealed Himself &lt;i&gt;at all&lt;/i&gt;.</content>
		<summary>&lt;p&gt;&lt;font face="Arial" size="4"&gt;
The West is going through a period of religious conflict.
Not the one you might be thinking of--this one has nothing to do
with Islam.  A thousand years ago, Franks and Saracens were fighting
over a smaller issue, namely whose book was really the
self-revelation of God.&lt;a href="#note1" name="ref1"&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;  Today's struggle is among people who identify
themselves as Christians.  They are fighting for the soul of the
Church and the existence of historic Christianity in the West.  In
the balance hangs the salvation of millions of God's people.  This
fight is about whether God has revealed Himself &lt;i&gt;at all&lt;/i&gt;.</summary>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>If Nature Has Laws, How Can God Do Anything?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://firstaidtheology.net/2007/12/23/gods-providence-part-1-if-nature-has-laws-how-can-god-do-anything.aspx?ref=rss" />
		<id>tag:firstaidtheology.net,2007-12-23:c4c7386b-600e-4931-aa0b-563fe9d9bd7e</id>
		<author>
			<name>Phil Hobbs</name>
		</author>
		<category term="Problems" />
		<updated>2007-12-23T06:12:00Z</updated>
		<published>2007-12-23T06:12:00Z</published>
		<content type="html">&lt;font size="4"&gt;Life is uncertain.  We try very hard to control what happens to us, and try even harder to ignore our total failure to do so.  We're not in control of our destiny.  So who or what is in control?

Whenever that question has been asked, from the very earliest times of which we have records, two sorts of answers have been given.  The majority view is that there is some sort of god in charge, which is called theism, and the minority view is that everything is ruled by chance or fate, which is called atheism. [1]

The choice between them appears often to be driven by emotion.  Modern theists...</content>
		<summary>&lt;font size="4"&gt;Life is uncertain.  We try very hard to control what happens to us, and try even harder to ignore our total failure to do so.  We're not in control of our destiny.  So who or what is in control?

Whenever that question has been asked, from the very earliest times of which we have records, two sorts of answers have been given.  The majority view is that there is some sort of god in charge, which is called theism, and the minority view is that everything is ruled by chance or fate, which is called atheism. [1]

The choice between them appears often to be driven by emotion.  Modern theists...</summary>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>What Has First Aid Got to Do With Theology?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://firstaidtheology.net/2007/11/20/what-has-first-aid-got-to-do-with-theology-2.aspx?ref=rss" />
		<id>tag:firstaidtheology.net,2007-11-24:a2da58cd-bf16-4688-8e45-1ae98e342305</id>
		<author>
			<name>Phil Hobbs</name>
		</author>
		<category term="General" />
		<updated>2007-11-24T18:15:00Z</updated>
		<published>2007-11-24T18:15:00Z</published>
		<content type="html">&lt;font size="4"&gt;&lt;br&gt;
People are vulnerable.&amp;nbsp; When
we're cut, we bleed.&amp;nbsp; When we're discouraged, we doubt.&amp;nbsp; When we're
tempted, we rationalize.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; At times like that, a good home group or an experienced
Christian friend can often provide just the sort of counsel or
encouragement we need.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; But what if we need something to defend
against an attack on the Faith, or to help an unbelieving friend
understand what Christians actually think?&amp;nbsp; That's where this blog
comes in useful, I hope.&amp;nbsp; &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;First Aid Theology&lt;/span&gt; is a collection of short pieces (about 2000 words) intended to clear up common sources of confusion about
Christianity.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
 They're 
written for people who don't necessarily have ...&lt;/font&gt;</content>
		<summary>&lt;font size="4"&gt;&lt;br&gt;
People are vulnerable.&amp;nbsp; When
we're cut, we bleed.&amp;nbsp; When we're discouraged, we doubt.&amp;nbsp; When we're
tempted, we rationalize.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; At times like that, a good home group or an experienced
Christian friend can often provide just the sort of counsel or
encouragement we need.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; But what if we need something to defend
against an attack on the Faith, or to help an unbelieving friend
understand what Christians actually think?&amp;nbsp; That's where this blog
comes in useful, I hope.&amp;nbsp; &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;First Aid Theology&lt;/span&gt; is a collection of short pieces (about 2000 words) intended to clear up common sources of confusion about
Christianity.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
 They're 
written for people who don't necessarily have ...&lt;/font&gt;</summary>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>How Could God Allow Suffering?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://firstaidtheology.net/2007/11/21/how-could-god-allow-suffering.aspx?ref=rss" />
		<id>tag:firstaidtheology.net,2007-11-23:8891c001-5638-40a7-ba6b-be09cf97fc02</id>
		<author>
			<name>Phil Hobbs</name>
		</author>
		<category term="Scripture" />
		<category term="Christian Teaching" />
		<updated>2007-11-23T20:00:00Z</updated>
		<published>2007-11-23T20:00:00Z</published>
		<content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;font style="font-family: Arial;" size="4"&gt;Do you ever wish that God would
smarten up?

&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;font style="font-family: Arial;" size="4"&gt;So many bad things happen to good people.  Innocent babies get cancer.
Young people get killed by drunk drivers.  Wars and earthquakes and floods
destroy people's homes and communities.  How can we believe in a good and
powerful God when all this bad stuff is going on all around us?&amp;nbsp; Sin explains a lot of suffering, but knowing that doesn't
blunt our sense of the injustice of it all.  What is all that suffering &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;about?&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp; Scripture provides an oblique but
very profound answer: &lt;em&gt;The Book of Job&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</content>
		<summary>&lt;p&gt;&lt;font style="font-family: Arial;" size="4"&gt;Do you ever wish that God would
smarten up?

&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;font style="font-family: Arial;" size="4"&gt;So many bad things happen to good people.  Innocent babies get cancer.
Young people get killed by drunk drivers.  Wars and earthquakes and floods
destroy people's homes and communities.  How can we believe in a good and
powerful God when all this bad stuff is going on all around us?&amp;nbsp; Sin explains a lot of suffering, but knowing that doesn't
blunt our sense of the injustice of it all.  What is all that suffering &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;about?&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp; Scripture provides an oblique but
very profound answer: &lt;em&gt;The Book of Job&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Does Science Disprove Religion?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://firstaidtheology.net/2007/11/21/does-science-disprove-religion.aspx?ref=rss" />
		<id>tag:firstaidtheology.net,2007-11-21:30f3f23d-155c-4676-9f78-600a22428c8f</id>
		<author>
			<name>Phil Hobbs</name>
		</author>
		<category term="Problems" />
		<category term="General" />
		<updated>2007-11-22T02:06:00Z</updated>
		<published>2007-11-22T02:06:00Z</published>
		<content type="html">&lt;div style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;&lt;font size="4"&gt;Epimenides was an ancient Greek philosopher and poet from the island of Crete.&amp;nbsp; Nowadays, he has three claims to fame: being quoted by St Luke;
being quoted by St. Paul; and being quoted by Aristotle. His philosophy is remembered for exactly one sentence. What he said was, 'Cretans are always liars'. Since he himself was a Cretan, with a bit
of imagination one can crispen this up to read, 'This statement is false.'&lt;br&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;&lt;font size="4"&gt;"This statement is false" : a very odd sort of sentence. If we assume it's true, it proclaims itself false, whereas if we assume it's false, we find that it agrees with us, which makes it look as though it's true....&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</content>
		<summary>&lt;div style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;&lt;font size="4"&gt;Epimenides was an ancient Greek philosopher and poet from the island of Crete.&amp;nbsp; Nowadays, he has three claims to fame: being quoted by St Luke;
being quoted by St. Paul; and being quoted by Aristotle. His philosophy is remembered for exactly one sentence. What he said was, 'Cretans are always liars'. Since he himself was a Cretan, with a bit
of imagination one can crispen this up to read, 'This statement is false.'&lt;br&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;&lt;font size="4"&gt;"This statement is false" : a very odd sort of sentence. If we assume it's true, it proclaims itself false, whereas if we assume it's false, we find that it agrees with us, which makes it look as though it's true....&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Dogma</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://firstaidtheology.net/2007/11/21/dogma.aspx?ref=rss" />
		<id>tag:firstaidtheology.net,2007-11-21:e0c62538-8133-4344-92df-1b1f33e37f23</id>
		<author>
			<name>Phil Hobbs</name>
		</author>
		<category term="Tradition" />
		<category term="Scripture" />
		<category term="Christian Teaching" />
		<updated>2007-11-21T19:49:00Z</updated>
		<published>2007-11-21T19:49:00Z</published>
		<content type="html">&lt;blockquote style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;&lt;font size="4"&gt;
For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public
relations, for nature cannot be fooled.

&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;font style="font-family: Arial;" face="Verdana" size="4"&gt;
        --Richard P. Feynman&lt;a href="#note1"&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;p style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;&lt;font size="4"&gt;
Words change their meanings over time.  Often it's just the general decay of language,
but sometimes deeper things are afoot.  For instance, until the early 20th century, &lt;em&gt;propaganda&lt;/em&gt; was a
merely neutral term that meant `information to be disseminated'.  Similarly, &lt;em&gt;dogma&lt;/em&gt; used
to mean `things the Church has established as truths about God and man'.  Since then, the
words have acquired less savory connotations.  Propaganda we can do without, but &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;dogma&lt;/span&gt; is of the greatest practical value, and needs to be recovered.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</content>
		<summary>&lt;blockquote style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;&lt;font size="4"&gt;
For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public
relations, for nature cannot be fooled.

&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;font style="font-family: Arial;" face="Verdana" size="4"&gt;
        --Richard P. Feynman&lt;a href="#note1"&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;p style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;&lt;font size="4"&gt;
Words change their meanings over time.  Often it's just the general decay of language,
but sometimes deeper things are afoot.  For instance, until the early 20th century, &lt;em&gt;propaganda&lt;/em&gt; was a
merely neutral term that meant `information to be disseminated'.  Similarly, &lt;em&gt;dogma&lt;/em&gt; used
to mean `things the Church has established as truths about God and man'.  Since then, the
words have acquired less savory connotations.  Propaganda we can do without, but &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;dogma&lt;/span&gt; is of the greatest practical value, and needs to be recovered.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</summary>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Canon</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://firstaidtheology.net/2007/11/21/the-canon.aspx?ref=rss" />
		<id>tag:firstaidtheology.net,2007-11-21:3d38ef43-0c4d-4a52-ae8a-8de7a706ca45</id>
		<author>
			<name>Phil Hobbs</name>
		</author>
		<category term="Tradition" />
		<category term="Scripture" />
		<category term="Christian Teaching" />
		<updated>2007-11-21T19:49:00Z</updated>
		<published>2007-11-21T19:49:00Z</published>
		<content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;font size="4"&gt;Some words are like neighbourhood children--they're vaguely familiar, but most of us
couldn't really say where they belong.  "Canon" is a word like that--we recognize that
it's probably something important, but saying just what that is may be a bit harder.
&lt;em&gt;Canon&lt;/em&gt; comes from a Greek word for a measuring stick--in its most precise meaning,
calling something &lt;em&gt;canonical&lt;/em&gt; says that it is an established standard of comparison.  In
English, the other meanings of &lt;em&gt;canon&lt;/em&gt; are slippery.  It's a poetical word, whose
overlapping meanings involve things like symmetry, beauty, and great value.  Something
canonical has been refined, polished, purged of unnecessary elements until it is a thing of rare
beauty.  A musical canon is a piece in which interlocking themes form a
complex and pleasing pattern, where tensions are built up and triumphantly resolved at the
ending.  A lot like the Bible, actually.  The Old and New Testaments are known as the
canon, in all these senses: it's a harmony and also a yardstick;.... &lt;br&gt;</content>
		<summary>&lt;p&gt;&lt;font size="4"&gt;Some words are like neighbourhood children--they're vaguely familiar, but most of us
couldn't really say where they belong.  "Canon" is a word like that--we recognize that
it's probably something important, but saying just what that is may be a bit harder.
&lt;em&gt;Canon&lt;/em&gt; comes from a Greek word for a measuring stick--in its most precise meaning,
calling something &lt;em&gt;canonical&lt;/em&gt; says that it is an established standard of comparison.  In
English, the other meanings of &lt;em&gt;canon&lt;/em&gt; are slippery.  It's a poetical word, whose
overlapping meanings involve things like symmetry, beauty, and great value.  Something
canonical has been refined, polished, purged of unnecessary elements until it is a thing of rare
beauty.  A musical canon is a piece in which interlocking themes form a
complex and pleasing pattern, where tensions are built up and triumphantly resolved at the
ending.  A lot like the Bible, actually.  The Old and New Testaments are known as the
canon, in all these senses: it's a harmony and also a yardstick;.... &lt;br&gt;</summary>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Hell</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://firstaidtheology.net/2007/11/20/hell.aspx?ref=rss" />
		<id>tag:firstaidtheology.net,2007-11-20:a2a90187-c0c9-49ee-853d-55377a2db760</id>
		<author>
			<name>Phil Hobbs</name>
		</author>
		<category term="Salvation" />
		<category term="Last Things" />
		<category term="Christian Teaching" />
		<updated>2007-11-20T20:24:00Z</updated>
		<published>2007-11-20T20:24:00Z</published>
		<content type="html">&lt;font size="4"&gt;Like most eschatological things, the fate of the lost is just vague enough that it's great place to raise dust without settling anything.&amp;nbsp; There are two main problems: first, the Scriptures
don't have a lot of details, and the ones they have don't fit together in a simple way; and second, the whole subject is so horrendous that it's hard to stay calm long enough to think it through.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
To get the doctrine out in the open: the predominant view throughout Church history has been that by our sin we have all rebelled against God, so that we ...&lt;/font&gt;</content>
		<summary>&lt;font size="4"&gt;Like most eschatological things, the fate of the lost is just vague enough that it's great place to raise dust without settling anything.&amp;nbsp; There are two main problems: first, the Scriptures
don't have a lot of details, and the ones they have don't fit together in a simple way; and second, the whole subject is so horrendous that it's hard to stay calm long enough to think it through.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
To get the doctrine out in the open: the predominant view throughout Church history has been that by our sin we have all rebelled against God, so that we ...&lt;/font&gt;</summary>
	</entry>
</feed>
